Author Archives: kcnukeswatch

Expert Witnesses to Testify at February 22nd Hearing on Ballot Initiatives

Kansas City Peace Planters

February 20, 2012

Contact:

Rachel M. MacNair, Ph.D., Petition Coordinator, (816)753-2057

Ann Suellentrop, (913)271-7925

Hearing: Wednesday, February 22, 2012, 1:30 PM

Planning, Zoning & Economic Development Committee, City Council Chamber, 26th Floor, City Hall.

City councilmember Ed Ford has introduced two ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 120146, and ORDINANCE NO. 120147 ,  to place each of our two initiatives on the ballot. One measure proposes to safeguard jobs with contingency conversion plans, and the other proposes to remove the city’s financial involvement with the plant. In support of these initiatives, and to challenge policies promoted by councilmembers we will offering testimonies from two expert witnesses:

Steven Starr, MT (ASCP) is Director of the Clinical Laboratory Science Program at the University of Missouri and Senior Scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility. He will present research on the impact of nuclear war on climate change, agriculture and public health. Starr’s studies, which have been published in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, demonstrate global and sustaining consequences even for nuclear war between states with smaller arsenals such as India and Pakistan.

Dr. Marcus Iszard is Director of Assessment and Associate Professor of Pharmacology/Toxicology at the University of Missouri at Kansas City.             He will discuss the environmental and health impacts of nuclear weapons production, including issues of employee health and safety at the Bannister Federal Complex and the new campus for the Kansas City Plant.

(The ordinances call for the initiatives to be placed on the ballot June 5 with the understanding this would be the next available election date. Let it be understood there is no intention to request the City spend its resources to hold an election on our initiatives alone. If there are no other measures on the June 5th ballot, our measures would be postponed for a later election, likely August 7th.)


Obama Administration’s Austerity Plan for the Nuclear Weapons Complex: Boost Funding for Stockpile Modernization

For Immediate Release: February 15, 2012

Contact: Ann Suellentrop, 913.271.7925, annsuellen@gmail.com

 Obama Administration’s Austerity Plan for the Nuclear Weapons Complex: Boost Funding for Stockpile Modernization

The Obama Administration, in its Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) exhibited the failure for practice to reflect policy. PSR Representative Ann Suellentrop, remarking on the $7.5 billion called for Weapons Activities in the request, “We need a national debate on the budget for our nuclear weapons stockpile, funding for stockpile modernization needs to be discussed.” Stockpile modernization refers to Life Extension Programs (LEP), the objective of LEPs is to upgrade the capabilities of warheads.

Amongst the $543 million request for LEPs include the modernization of the B61, under scrutiny from the Hill and abroad. Last September Senate appropriators reduced funding for the B61 LEP, concerned the program was compromising the reliability of the warhead by introducing new safety and surety features. In addition to challenges from appropriators, deployment of the B61 warhead in NATO countries is hotly disputed. The overseas mission of the B61 will likely be extinct before modernization of the warhead is completed in the early 2020s.

Boosting modernization for warheads typically means sacrificing funding for dismantlement operations. The bays at the Pantex Plant carry out dismantlement and LEP work; it is no surprise which program takes precedence. The Fiscal Year 2013 request for dismantlement and disposition, $51 million, is a 10% decrease from funding for Fiscal Year 2012.

PSR representative Alicia Dressman takes issue with budget priorities for the Kansas City Plant, “The KCP requests $234 million for Directed Stockpile Work, focusing on coordination with Pantex to procure and supply non-nuclear components for the B61 LEP. We would like to see cooperation between the KCP and Pantex on dismantlement of our nation’s stockpile, not modernization.”

“There is hope for the Obama Administration yet, plans for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) facility in Los Alamos, NM, which would produce plutonium pits for modernized warheads, are indefinitely postponed. PSR Kansas City wishes the administration and Congress will adhere to a budget that is worthy of a policy seeking a “nuclear weapons free world.”

PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY®

Greater Kansas City Chapter


KC Peace Planters Reach Goal on Petition Drive: Over 5,000 Signatures Delivered to City Hall

Press Release

Kansas City Peace Planters

Contact:

Rachel M. MacNair, Ph.D., Petition Coordinator, (816)753-2057

Ann Suellentrop, (913)271-7925

.

Having once again collected in the range of 5,000 signatures from Kansas City Missouri residents, this time on two separate initiative petitions, KC Peace Planters turn in both sets of petitions to the City Clerk at 10 am on Monday, November 14, 2011.

.

Below is a short summary of each initiative, and below that is the precise legal language. We listened carefully to objections raised by councilmembers in our previous effort, and we believe these are strengthened and will more clearly stand up in litigation if necessary.

.

Summary, Petition 1: Removal of City financial involvement in production of nuclear weapons components

1. Kansas City won’t make any more contracts for parts for nuclear weapons or finance their production in the future.

2. Kansas City will divest itself of the municipal bonds for nuclear weapons parts, to the extent allowed by law.

3. No local agency will own the plant.

4. If the court knocks down any provision, that provision can be cut off and the rest remain.

.

Summary, Petition 2: Safeguarding jobs with contingency plans for nuclear weapons facilities

1. The City will make detailed contingency plans for converting nuclear weapons plants in case they’re no longer utilized for that purpose.

2. Renewable energy production is an option to be considered.

3. The plans will be updated annually.

4. The plans will be available for public comment.

.

Legal Wording, Petition 1:

Removal of City financial involvement in production of nuclear weapons components

.

1) The City of Kansas City, Missouri (“the City”) shall not enter into any future contracts whereby it will be directly financially involved in any facilities that produce or procure components for, assemble, or refurbish nuclear weapons except for outside infrastructure improvements customarily provided by cities. The City is also barred from funding or subsidizing such a facility through taxes, bonds, loans, tax credits, credit, or any other financial scheme or mechanism.

.

2) The City shall use all means consistent with law and existing contractual obligations to divest itself as soon as reasonably feasible of current municipal bonds which finance or subsidize any facility which produces or procures any parts for, assembles, or refurbishes nuclear weapons.

.

3) From the effective date of this ordinance, no municipal agency, nor any body or entity controlled or appointed by the City, is authorized to own or lease any facilities involved in nuclear weapons production or procurement, assembly, or refurbishing.

.

4) The provisions of this Ordinance are severable. If any court of competent jurisdiction decides that any section, clause, sentence, part, or provision of this Ordinance is illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect, impair, or invalidate any of the remaining sections, clauses, sentences, parts, or provisions of the Ordinance.

Safeguarding jobs with contingency plans for nuclear weapons facilities

.

1) The City of Kansas City, Missouri (“the City”) shall provide for the professional preparation of at least one economic conversion plan at any nuclear-weapons components production and procurement facilities within its boundaries, whether well-established or being built for the purpose, for the contingency that the federal government exercises its established contractual option of vacating the premises, or fails to make appropriations for the continued use of the facility, or that such facilities become abandoned or under-utilized. Such plans will include technical specifications, financial calculations, and provisions for any necessary program for retraining workers to the skills required at the converted facility, so that potential developers can be contacted quickly and will have adequate information to find the proposal attractive to their interests.

.

2) Production of new environmentally sound energy or other environmental technologies which will benefit the residents of the municipality and surrounding areas should be considered as an option for these facilities.

.

3) The plan or plans are to be reviewed and updated annually until such time as the facility has been successfully converted to other uses or appropriate contracts are in place to do so.

.

4) The plan or plans are to be made available for public inspection, allowing for public comment for improvement.


Dr. Ira Helfand, Co-Founder of PSR, in Kansas City for Speaker Tour

“Still ‘Modernizing’ Nuclear Weapons?”
Dr. Ira Helfand from Physicians for Social Responsibility
Sunday, October 9, 2011 – 10 a.m. -11 a.m.
All Souls Forum, 4500 Warwick, Kansas City, MO 64111

Dr. Ira Helfand, a practicing Emergency Room physician, is a co-founder and past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility, the U.S. affiliate of the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War which received the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize. He will speak on the medical consequences of nuclear war and the dangers of our continued reliance on and development of new nuclear weapons, including the perplexing Kansas City Plant, which builds non-nuclear components for nuclear weapons in south Kansas City.

The Great Nuclear Debate: Nuclear Weapons-Making in KC
Sunday, October 9, 2011, 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
Stack Auditorium of UMKC’s Royall Hall, 5300 Rockhill Rd.

The debate will be between Ira Helfand, MD, board member of Physicians for Social Responsibility, and Maurice Smith, a former staff engineer for the Department of Energy’s Kansas City Plant, which makes 85% of the parts for U.S. nuclear weapons. Jabulani Leffall of KCUR 89.3 FM’s “Central Standard” Program will be the moderator.

Presentation to Model United Nations Club
Monday, October 10, 2011, 12:00 – 12:50 p.m.
Johnson County Community College, Room GEB 233

For the latest on all events, please visit our Calendar.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.